S.G.KARTHIK vs S.S.GIRISH BABU — 71/2023

Case under U/o 7 Rule of 1 C.p.c Section U/O 7, RULE 1, OF CPC. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.

Hearing Next hearing 24-Jun-2026

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAMS410002502023

Filing Number

68/2023

Filing Date

13-Feb-2023

Registration No

71/2023

Registration Date

14-Feb-2023

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KRISHNARAJANAGARA

Judge

444-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/o 7 Rule of 1 C.p.c Section U/O 7, RULE 1, OF CPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.S.G.KARTHIK

    Adv. NAGARAJA. S

  2. 2.S G SUSHMITHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.S.S.GIRISH BABU

  2. 2.M N PUSHPA

  3. 3.S R BHASKAR

Case History

  1. 24-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 30-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Objection

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  4. 12-Feb-2026

    Objection

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  5. 29-Jan-2026

    Argument

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  6. 15-Dec-2025

    Argument

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  7. 23-Oct-2025

    Cross Examination

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  8. 20-Sep-2025

    Cross Examination

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  9. 30-Jul-2025

    Plant Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  10. 24-Jun-2025

    DepositionView PDF

    In case OMS 71/2023 before the Principal Civil Judge, K.R. Nagar, on 24.06.2025, the court recorded the petitioner's sworn statement (affidavit) and admitted multiple documentary exhibits including an online purchase agreement (NIP-1), certified copies (NIP-2 to NIP-5), an M.R. document (NIP-6), RTCs (NIP-7 to NIP-13), a printed book (NIP-14), and an online family tree (NIP-15). The case was adjourned as the petitioner's counsel sought further time to continue the main hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  11. 24-Jun-2025

    Plant Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  12. 10-Mar-2025

    Plant Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  13. 07-Jan-2025

    Plant Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  14. 22-Oct-2024

    Plant Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  15. 02-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  16. 12-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  17. 27-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  18. 08-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  19. 25-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  20. 06-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  21. 01-Sep-2023

    Appearance Of Party

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  22. 23-Jun-2023

    Summons

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  23. 22-May-2023

    Summons

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  24. 30-Mar-2023

    Summons

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  25. 02-Mar-2023

    OrdersView PDF

  26. 02-Mar-2023

    Notice

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  27. 28-Feb-2023

    Order

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  28. 27-Feb-2023

    Amended Plaint

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  29. 22-Feb-2023

    Hearing

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  30. 15-Feb-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 13-Feb-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 71/2023

casestatus.in Summary

In case OMS 71/2023 before the Principal Civil Judge, K.R. Nagar, on 24.06.2025, the court recorded the petitioner's sworn statement (affidavit) and admitted multiple documentary exhibits including an online purchase agreement (NIP-1), certified copies (NIP-2 to NIP-5), an M.R. document (NIP-6), RTCs (NIP-7 to NIP-13), a printed book (NIP-14), and an online family tree (NIP-15). The case was adjourned as the petitioner's counsel sought further time to continue the main hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case