KIZAR PASHA vs ASGHAR AHAMMED — 68/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section U/S 138, NI ACT. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 13th July 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 13-Jul-2026 this date has passed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAMS410002392025

Filing Number

69/2025

Filing Date

12-Feb-2025

Registration No

68/2025

Registration Date

12-Feb-2025

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KRISHNARAJANAGARA

Judge

1097-I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section U/S 138, NI ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KIZAR PASHA

    Adv. M.C. SHASHIKANTH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ASGHAR AHAMMED

Case History

  1. 13-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  3. 11-May-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  5. 22-Jan-2026

    Amended Plaint

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  6. 23-Dec-2025

    Amended Plaint

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  7. 02-Dec-2025

    Objection

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  8. 17-Nov-2025

    Steps

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  9. 03-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  10. 04-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  11. 18-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  12. 08-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  13. 17-Jun-2025

    PleaView PDF

    Summary of Case 68/2025 Petitioner: Kizar Pasha (Age 46) Respondent: Asghar Ahammed (Age 50) Charge: Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (bounced cheque case) Facts: Asghar Ahammed borrowed ₹7,60,000 from Kizar Pasha. To repay the loan, Ahammed issued cheque no. 072662 dated 29.11.2024 drawn on Canara Bank, Bengaluru. When presented for encashment, the cheque was dishonoured with the reason "insufficient funds." Pasha issued a legal notice on 12.12.2024 demanding repayment, but Ahammed failed to pay. Pasha filed the criminal complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Order: The charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act have been framed against the accused Asghar Ahammed. The accusation has been read and explained to the accused in a language he understands, and he has been made to understand the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  14. 17-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  15. 16-May-2025

    Framing Of Charge And Plea

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  16. 09-May-2025

    Framing Of Charge And Plea

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  17. 11-Apr-2025

    Framing Of Charge And Plea

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  18. 18-Mar-2025

    NBW To Accused

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  19. 12-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  20. 12-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 68/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 68/2025 Petitioner: Kizar Pasha (Age 46) Respondent: Asghar Ahammed (Age 50) Charge: Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (bounced cheque case) Facts: Asghar Ahammed borrowed ₹7,60,000 from Kizar Pasha. To repay the loan, Ahammed issued cheque no. 072662 dated 29.11.2024 drawn on Canara Bank, Bengaluru. When presented for encashment, the cheque was dishonoured with the reason "insufficient funds." Pasha issued a legal notice on 12.12.2024 demanding repayment, but Ahammed failed to pay. Pasha filed the criminal complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Order: The charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act have been framed against the accused Asghar Ahammed. The accusation has been read and explained to the accused in a language he understands, and he has been made to understand the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case