Saligrama Police Station vs KUMARA — 42/2017

Case under Others Section 353,504,506,34,IPC. Status: CALL ON. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAMS410001692017

CALL ON

Next Hearing

24th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

42/2017

Filing Date

25-01-2017

Registration No

42/2017

Registration Date

25-01-2017

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KRISHNARAJANAGARA

Judge

1097-I ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KRISHNARAJANAGAR

FIR Details

Police Station

SAALIGRAMA PS

Year

0

Acts & Sections

OTHERS Section 353,504,506,34,IPC

Petitioner(s)

Saligrama Police Station

Respondent(s)

KUMARA

ABHISHEK

Hearing History

Judge: 1097-I ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KRISHNARAJANAGAR

12-03-2026

CALL ON

07-03-2026

CALL ON

02-03-2026

NBW TO ACCUSED

13-01-2026

NBW TO ACCUSED

03-01-2026

CALL ON

Interim Orders

06-02-2020
Orders
04-03-2025
Deposition
15-07-2025
Deposition
09-09-2025
Deposition
20-11-2025
313 Statement

Summary This is a civil case (CC 42/2017) from the 1st Additional Civil Judge and JMMC Court, K.R. Nagar, involving accused Kumar against Saligram Police Station. The document contains the accused's statement under IPC Section 313, recording his responses to prosecution witnesses' testimony regarding illegal felling of Neelgiri (blue gum) trees on 27/07/2016. The accused's detailed replies to 12 questions are documented, followed by confirmation that his statement was read back to him in his understood language before being authenticated by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary This is a civil case (CC 42/2017) from the 1st Additional Civil Judge and JMMC Court, K.R. Nagar, involving accused Kumar against Saligram Police Station. The document contains the accused's statement under IPC Section 313, recording his responses to prosecution witnesses' testimony regarding illegal felling of Neelgiri (blue gum) trees on 27/07/2016. The accused's detailed replies to 12 questions are documented, followed by confirmation that his statement was read back to him in his understood language before being authenticated by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KRISHNARAJANAGARA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case