B.P. SATHEESHA vs KUMARANAYAKA — 48/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O 7, RULE 1 CPC. Status: Cross Examination. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.

Cross Examination Next hearing 03-Jul-2026 this date has passed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAMS410001472025

Filing Number

50/2025

Filing Date

24-Jan-2025

Registration No

48/2025

Registration Date

25-Jan-2025

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KRISHNARAJANAGARA

Judge

1097-I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O 7, RULE 1 CPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.B.P. SATHEESHA

    Adv. K.N. SATHEESH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KUMARANAYAKA

Case History

  1. 03-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Cross Examination

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case 48/2025 Summary: B.P. Satheesha's application (IA No. 4) seeking police protection to implement a temporary injunction order dated 01/03/2025 was allowed. The court directed the concerned police PSI to provide necessary protection to the plaintiff whenever the defendant causes or continues to cause interference with the plaintiff's peaceful possession of the suit property, in violation of the temporary injunction. The case was called for regular hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Call On

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Order

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    Objection

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  7. 17-Mar-2026

    Objection

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  8. 13-Mar-2026

    Objection

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  9. 12-Mar-2026

    Objection

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  10. 05-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  11. 12-Dec-2025

    Plant Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  12. 24-Oct-2025

    IssueView PDF

  13. 24-Oct-2025

    List Of Witness And Documents

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  14. 17-Oct-2025

    Call On

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  15. 08-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  16. 11-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  17. 22-Jul-2025

    ExhibitsView PDF

  18. 22-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  19. 26-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  20. 09-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  21. 01-Mar-2025

    IssueView PDF

  22. 01-Mar-2025

    OrdersView PDF

  23. 01-Mar-2025

    List Of Witness And Documents

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  24. 24-Feb-2025

    Order

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  25. 21-Feb-2025

    Order

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  26. 20-Feb-2025

    Order

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  27. 14-Feb-2025

    Order

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  28. 11-Feb-2025

    Objection

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  29. 10-Feb-2025

    Written Statement

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  30. 07-Feb-2025

    Written Statement

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  31. 06-Feb-2025

    Call On

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  32. 27-Jan-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 24-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 48/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 48/2025 Summary: B.P. Satheesha's application (IA No. 4) seeking police protection to implement a temporary injunction order dated 01/03/2025 was allowed. The court directed the concerned police PSI to provide necessary protection to the plaintiff whenever the defendant causes or continues to cause interference with the plaintiff's peaceful possession of the suit property, in violation of the temporary injunction. The case was called for regular hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case