SRINIVAS vs ANJANIGOWDA — 75/2022
Case under U/o 7 Rule of 1 C.p.c. Section U/O7RULE1CPC. Status: ORDERS. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS400015822022
Next Hearing
15th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
75/2022
Filing Date
11-10-2022
Registration No
75/2022
Registration Date
13-10-2022
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KRISHNARAJANAGARA
Judge
922-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KRISHNARAJANAGAR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SRINIVAS
Adv. RAVICHANDRA S
Respondent(s)
ANJANIGOWDA
DILEEPA
Hearing History
Judge: 922-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KRISHNARAJANAGAR
ORDERS
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | ORDERS | |
| 07-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 11-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 13-01-2026 | HEARING | |
| 12-12-2025 | HEARING |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: O.S. No. 75/2022 Outcome: The court examined witness testimony and property survey records (Survey Nos. 36/2, 37/2, and related plots) in a civil suit involving land ownership disputes. The court found that the plaintiff's name and the defendant's name (S.B. Anjanigaud) were used interchangeably in various property documents, and a donation deed dated 03-12-2013 was executed with misuse of names, creating conflicting claims to the disputed properties. The court determined that the witness testimony regarding property boundaries and ownership claims contained contradictions and proceeded with cross-examination of the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: O.S. No. 75/2022 Outcome: The court examined witness testimony and property survey records (Survey Nos. 36/2, 37/2, and related plots) in a civil suit involving land ownership disputes. The court found that the plaintiff's name and the defendant's name (S.B. Anjanigaud) were used interchangeably in various property documents, and a donation deed dated 03-12-2013 was executed with misuse of names, creating conflicting claims to the disputed properties. The court determined that the witness testimony regarding property boundaries and ownership claims contained contradictions and proceeded with cross-examination of the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts