Karnataka Grameena Bank vs SMT VASANTHAMMA — 272/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7RULE1OFCPC. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAMS400015372025

Filing Number

275/2025

Filing Date

08-Dec-2025

Registration No

272/2025

Registration Date

10-Dec-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KRISHNARAJANAGARA

Judge

922-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 7RULE1OFCPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Karnataka Grameena Bank

    Adv. SHIVAKUMAR. K.C.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SMT VASANTHAMMA

  2. 2.SHIVAKUMAR.N.B

  3. 3.GURUMURTHY.N.B

  4. 4.SMT JANAKAMMA.N.B

  5. 5.SMT PREMAKUMARI.N.B

  6. 6.SMT BABYRANI

  7. 7.SMT USHARANI

  8. 8.LOKESHA

  9. 9.MADHUKARA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Orders

    The Lok-Adalath accepted a voluntary and genuine compromise settlement between the plaintiff's bank and defendants, whereby Defendant No.1 paid the entire disputed amount to the bank. The suit was dismissed as settled, and the court directed refund of court fees to the plaintiff's bank according to law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Settlement

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Steps

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  6. 24-Jan-2026

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  7. 10-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 08-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 272/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Lok-Adalath accepted a voluntary and genuine compromise settlement between the plaintiff's bank and defendants, whereby Defendant No.1 paid the entire disputed amount to the bank. The suit was dismissed as settled, and the court directed refund of court fees to the plaintiff's bank according to law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case