Karnataka Grameena Bank vs MUKUNDA — 270/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7RULE1OFCPC. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS400015352025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
273/2025
Filing Date
08-12-2025
Registration No
270/2025
Registration Date
10-12-2025
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KRISHNARAJANAGARA
Judge
922-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KRISHNARAJANAGAR
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Karnataka Grameena Bank
Adv. SHIVAKUMAR. K.C.
Respondent(s)
MUKUNDA
SHIVAKUMAR
SHIVANANDA
SMT VINODA
SMT RAJANI
GOWDAPPA
Hearing History
Judge: 922-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KRISHNARAJANAGAR
Disposed
SETTLEMENT
EVIDENCE
APPEARANCE OF PARTY
A.D.R.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 12-03-2026 | SETTLEMENT | |
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 24-01-2026 | APPEARANCE OF PARTY | |
| 10-12-2025 | A.D.R. |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Lok-Adalath court accepted a voluntary and genuine settlement between a plaintiff bank and defendants, wherein defendant No.1 paid the entire disputed amount to the plaintiff's bank. The suit was dismissed as settled, and the court directed refund of court fees to the plaintiff's bank according to law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Lok-Adalath court accepted a voluntary and genuine settlement between a plaintiff bank and defendants, wherein defendant No.1 paid the entire disputed amount to the plaintiff's bank. The suit was dismissed as settled, and the court directed refund of court fees to the plaintiff's bank according to law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts