Karnataka Grameena Bank vs PUTTARAJEGOWDA — 239/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7RULE1OFCPC. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS400014052025
Filing Number
242/2025
Filing Date
14-Nov-2025
Registration No
239/2025
Registration Date
18-Nov-2025
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KRISHNARAJANAGARA
Judge
922-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Karnataka Grameena Bank
Adv. SHIVAKUMAR. K.C.
Respondent(s)
-
1.PUTTARAJEGOWDA
-
2.RAMEGOWDA
-
3.CHANNEGOWDA
-
4.SMT PRABHAVATHI
-
5.SMT PADMA
-
6.SMT ANUSUYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: OS 239/2025 Karnataka Grameena Bank's dispute against Puttarajegowda, Ramegowda, and Channegowda was settled through Lok-Adalath compromise on 14/03/2026. Following pre-conciliation on 11/03/2026, the parties agreed to an amicable settlement whereby defendant No. 1 paid the entire outstanding amount to the bank. The court, finding the settlement voluntary and genuine, accepted the compromise memo and dismissed the suit as settled, directing court fee refund to the plaintiff bank. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
11-Mar-2026
Settlement
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
13-Feb-2026
Plant Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
02-Feb-2026
Plant Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
18-Dec-2025
Plant Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
18-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 239/2025
Case Summary: OS 239/2025 Karnataka Grameena Bank's dispute against Puttarajegowda, Ramegowda, and Channegowda was settled through Lok-Adalath compromise on 14/03/2026. Following pre-conciliation on 11/03/2026, the parties agreed to an amicable settlement whereby defendant No. 1 paid the entire outstanding amount to the bank. The court, finding the settlement voluntary and genuine, accepted the compromise memo and dismissed the suit as settled, directing court fee refund to the plaintiff bank. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts