Karnataka Grameena Bank vs PUTTARAJEGOWDA — 239/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7RULE1OFCPC. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAMS400014052025

Case disposed

Filing Number

242/2025

Filing Date

14-11-2025

Registration No

239/2025

Registration Date

18-11-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KRISHNARAJANAGARA

Judge

922-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KRISHNARAJANAGAR

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 7RULE1OFCPC

Petitioner(s)

Karnataka Grameena Bank

Adv. SHIVAKUMAR. K.C.

Respondent(s)

PUTTARAJEGOWDA

RAMEGOWDA

CHANNEGOWDA

SMT PRABHAVATHI

SMT PADMA

SMT ANUSUYA

Hearing History

Judge: 922-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KRISHNARAJANAGAR

14-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

SETTLEMENT

13-02-2026

PLANT EVIDENCE

02-02-2026

PLANT EVIDENCE

18-12-2025

PLANT EVIDENCE

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
Orders

Case Summary: OS 239/2025 Karnataka Grameena Bank's dispute against Puttarajegowda, Ramegowda, and Channegowda was settled through Lok-Adalath compromise on 14/03/2026. Following pre-conciliation on 11/03/2026, the parties agreed to an amicable settlement whereby defendant No. 1 paid the entire outstanding amount to the bank. The court, finding the settlement voluntary and genuine, accepted the compromise memo and dismissed the suit as settled, directing court fee refund to the plaintiff bank. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OS 239/2025 Karnataka Grameena Bank's dispute against Puttarajegowda, Ramegowda, and Channegowda was settled through Lok-Adalath compromise on 14/03/2026. Following pre-conciliation on 11/03/2026, the parties agreed to an amicable settlement whereby defendant No. 1 paid the entire outstanding amount to the bank. The court, finding the settlement voluntary and genuine, accepted the compromise memo and dismissed the suit as settled, directing court fee refund to the plaintiff bank. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KRISHNARAJANAGARA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case