Karnataka Grameena Bank vs KUMARA — 226/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26RULE1OFCPC. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAMS400013712025

Filing Number

231/2025

Filing Date

11-Nov-2025

Registration No

226/2025

Registration Date

13-Nov-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KRISHNARAJANAGARA

Judge

922-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26RULE1OFCPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Karnataka Grameena Bank

    Adv. MURTHY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KUMARA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Summary: The Lok-Adalath accepted a compromise settlement between the plaintiff bank and defendants reached during pre-conciliation on 10.03.2026, finding it voluntary and genuine. The defendant paid the entire disputed amount to the plaintiff's bank, and the suit was dismissed as settled with court fee refund directed to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Settlement

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    A.D.R.

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  6. 12-Jan-2026

    Written Statement

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  7. 11-Dec-2025

    Written Statement

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  8. 13-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 11-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 226/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Lok-Adalath accepted a compromise settlement between the plaintiff bank and defendants reached during pre-conciliation on 10.03.2026, finding it voluntary and genuine. The defendant paid the entire disputed amount to the plaintiff's bank, and the suit was dismissed as settled with court fee refund directed to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case