GIRISHA vs MURTHY — 349/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section U/S223BNSS. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAMS400011342024

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

09th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

349/2024

Filing Date

23-11-2024

Registration No

349/2024

Registration Date

23-11-2024

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KRISHNARAJANAGARA

Judge

922-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KRISHNARAJANAGAR

Acts & Sections

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT Section U/S223BNSS

Petitioner(s)

GIRISHA

Adv. P. DAYANAND

Respondent(s)

MURTHY

Hearing History

Judge: 922-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KRISHNARAJANAGAR

17-03-2026

EVIDENCE

13-03-2026

EVIDENCE

07-03-2026

EVIDENCE

06-03-2026

ARGUMENTS

20-02-2026

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

29-01-2026
Orders
29-01-2026
Plea
17-03-2026
Deposition

Summary In Civil Case No. 349/2024, the court examined witness testimony on 17-03-2026 regarding financial transactions between the parties spanning approximately 3 years. The accused received ₹90,000 via Google Pay and ₹90,000 through bank transfers (₹60,000 from Union Bank and ₹30,000 from Canara Bank), along with ₹10,000 in cash and a check for ₹1,50,000 with a 6-month repayment commitment. The court found no financial dealings existed between the parties as of 07-02-2024 and dismissed the ₹1 lakh transaction claim, allowing cross-examination by the accused's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In Civil Case No. 349/2024, the court examined witness testimony on 17-03-2026 regarding financial transactions between the parties spanning approximately 3 years. The accused received ₹90,000 via Google Pay and ₹90,000 through bank transfers (₹60,000 from Union Bank and ₹30,000 from Canara Bank), along with ₹10,000 in cash and a check for ₹1,50,000 with a 6-month repayment commitment. The court found no financial dealings existed between the parties as of 07-02-2024 and dismissed the ₹1 lakh transaction claim, allowing cross-examination by the accused's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KRISHNARAJANAGARA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case