GIRISHA vs MURTHY — 349/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section U/S223BNSS. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAMS400011342024
Next Hearing
09th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
349/2024
Filing Date
23-11-2024
Registration No
349/2024
Registration Date
23-11-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KRISHNARAJANAGARA
Judge
922-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KRISHNARAJANAGAR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GIRISHA
Adv. P. DAYANAND
Respondent(s)
MURTHY
Hearing History
Judge: 922-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KRISHNARAJANAGAR
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
ARGUMENTS
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 20-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary In Civil Case No. 349/2024, the court examined witness testimony on 17-03-2026 regarding financial transactions between the parties spanning approximately 3 years. The accused received ₹90,000 via Google Pay and ₹90,000 through bank transfers (₹60,000 from Union Bank and ₹30,000 from Canara Bank), along with ₹10,000 in cash and a check for ₹1,50,000 with a 6-month repayment commitment. The court found no financial dealings existed between the parties as of 07-02-2024 and dismissed the ₹1 lakh transaction claim, allowing cross-examination by the accused's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In Civil Case No. 349/2024, the court examined witness testimony on 17-03-2026 regarding financial transactions between the parties spanning approximately 3 years. The accused received ₹90,000 via Google Pay and ₹90,000 through bank transfers (₹60,000 from Union Bank and ₹30,000 from Canara Bank), along with ₹10,000 in cash and a check for ₹1,50,000 with a 6-month repayment commitment. The court found no financial dealings existed between the parties as of 07-02-2024 and dismissed the ₹1 lakh transaction claim, allowing cross-examination by the accused's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts