M.R.HARISHA vs K.VENKATESHA — 40/2022
Case under U/o 7 Rule of 1 C.p.c. Section U/O7R1OFCPC. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS400009562022
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
40/2022
Filing Date
21-06-2022
Registration No
40/2022
Registration Date
22-06-2022
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KRISHNARAJANAGARA
Judge
922-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KRISHNARAJANAGAR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M.R.HARISHA
Adv. RAVI SHANKAR. L.V.
M R SATHYA
M R LOKESHA
K P PRAMEELA
Respondent(s)
K.VENKATESHA
A V MADHUKUMAR
A V DEEPAK
K A SHOKA
H K GEETHA
K SURESHA
A NAGARAJU
BHAGYA
VARALAKSHMI
A P THIMMEGOWDA
A J MANJUNATHA
RAJAMMA
Hearing History
Judge: 922-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KRISHNARAJANAGAR
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
WRITTEN STATEMENT
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 19-02-2026 | WRITTEN STATEMENT | |
| 10-02-2026 | SUMMONS | |
| 09-01-2026 | SUMMONS |
Interim Orders
Summary The court allowed the application filed by the GPA holder of plaintiff No.4, permitting plaintiff No.3 to be transposed as defendant No.13 in this partition suit. The court found that plaintiff No.3 was uncooperative with other plaintiffs and did not appear despite notice, making the transposition necessary to do complete justice and avoid multiplicity of proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court allowed the application filed by the GPA holder of plaintiff No.4, permitting plaintiff No.3 to be transposed as defendant No.13 in this partition suit. The court found that plaintiff No.3 was uncooperative with other plaintiffs and did not appear despite notice, making the transposition necessary to do complete justice and avoid multiplicity of proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts