ARUNKUMAR H.K vs UDAYAKUMAR A.K — 223/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 223OFBNSSACT. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAMS400007342025

Filing Number

223/2025

Filing Date

25-Jun-2025

Registration No

223/2025

Registration Date

25-Jun-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KRISHNARAJANAGARA

Judge

922-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 223OFBNSSACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ARUNKUMAR H.K

    Adv. M.C. SHASHIKANTH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UDAYAKUMAR A.K

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Case 223/2025 Summary The Lok-Adalath dismissed the complaint filed by ARUNKUMAR H.K against UDAYAKUMAR A.K after the parties settled their dispute out of court following pre-conciliation on 23/01/2026. The accused paid the entire cheque amount owed to the complainant's bank, and the complainant's counsel requested dismissal, which was granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  4. 23-Jan-2026

    Settlement

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  5. 20-Nov-2025

    NBW To Accused

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  6. 25-Sep-2025

    NBW To Accused

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  7. 05-Aug-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar

  8. 25-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 25-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 223/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 223/2025 Summary The Lok-Adalath dismissed the complaint filed by ARUNKUMAR H.K against UDAYAKUMAR A.K after the parties settled their dispute out of court following pre-conciliation on 23/01/2026. The accused paid the entire cheque amount owed to the complainant's bank, and the complainant's counsel requested dismissal, which was granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case