NATESH vs VEERUPAKSHA — 170/2020
Case under U/s 5/200 R/w 138 Ni Act Section U/S138OFN.IACT. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAMS400006032020
Filing Number
170/2020
Filing Date
24-10-2020
Registration No
170/2020
Registration Date
24-10-2020
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KRISHNARAJANAGARA
Judge
922-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KRISHNARAJANAGAR
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NATESH
Adv. B V NAGESH
Respondent(s)
VEERUPAKSHA
Hearing History
Judge: 922-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KRISHNARAJANAGAR
Disposed
SETTLEMENT
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-02-2026 | SETTLEMENT |
| 02-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 21-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 12-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CC 170/2020 (Natesh v. Veerupaksha) The Lok-Adalath dismissed the complaint after the parties reached an out-of-court settlement during pre-conciliation on 12/02/2026. The respondent paid the entire amount owed to the petitioner, and the complainant's counsel requested dismissal. The court accordingly dismissed the complaint as not pressed and closed the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: CC 170/2020 (Natesh v. Veerupaksha) The Lok-Adalath dismissed the complaint after the parties reached an out-of-court settlement during pre-conciliation on 12/02/2026. The respondent paid the entire amount owed to the petitioner, and the complainant's counsel requested dismissal. The court accordingly dismissed the complaint as not pressed and closed the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts