KEERTHI K.M. vs KUMARA M. — 178/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section U/S223BNSS. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAMS400005852025
Filing Number
179/2025
Filing Date
23-May-2025
Registration No
178/2025
Registration Date
23-May-2025
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KRISHNARAJANAGARA
Judge
922-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KEERTHI K.M.
Adv. B V NAGESH
Respondent(s)
-
1.KUMARA M.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Orders
Case Summary: CC 178/2025 The Lok-Adalath dismissed the complaint filed by Keerthi K.M. against Kumara M. after the parties reached an out-of-court settlement during pre-conciliation proceedings. The respondent paid the entire amount claimed by the petitioner, and the petitioner's counsel requested dismissal, which the court granted. The case stands closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
02-Mar-2026
Settlement
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
28-Feb-2026
Steps
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
30-Jan-2026
NBW To Accused
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
26-Nov-2025
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
25-Oct-2025
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
01-Sep-2025
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
01-Aug-2025
Steps
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
19-Jul-2025
Steps
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
11-Jul-2025
Steps
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Krishnarajanagar
-
23-May-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 178/2025
Case Summary: CC 178/2025 The Lok-Adalath dismissed the complaint filed by Keerthi K.M. against Kumara M. after the parties reached an out-of-court settlement during pre-conciliation proceedings. The respondent paid the entire amount claimed by the petitioner, and the petitioner's counsel requested dismissal, which the court granted. The case stands closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts