SHIVANNA vs LALITHA — 107/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section U/S223BNSS. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAMS400003602025

HEARING

Next Hearing

10th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

107/2025

Filing Date

28-03-2025

Registration No

107/2025

Registration Date

28-03-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KRISHNARAJANAGARA

Judge

922-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KRISHNARAJANAGAR

Acts & Sections

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT Section U/S223BNSS

Petitioner(s)

SHIVANNA

Adv. A. THIMMAPPA

Respondent(s)

LALITHA

Hearing History

Judge: 922-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KRISHNARAJANAGAR

25-03-2026

HEARING

07-03-2026

HEARING

19-02-2026

OBJECTION

11-02-2026

OBJECTION

04-02-2026

ARGUMENTS

Interim Orders

06-10-2025
Orders
06-10-2025
313 Statement
06-10-2025
Plea
22-01-2026
Deposition

Summary: In Civil Case No. 107/2025, the court recorded the testimony of witness PW-1 on 22-01-2026. The accused's defense counsel argued that the accused is a farmer with agricultural income of Rs. 6-7 lakhs annually and lacks financial means to repay Rs. 2,50,000. The court found the allegations against the accused credible, noting the check (Exhibit P-1) was presented to the bank on 03.01.2025 and the accused lacks the financial capacity to honor it. The court rejected the defense arguments and proceeded with the case based on the witness testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Civil Case No. 107/2025, the court recorded the testimony of witness PW-1 on 22-01-2026. The accused's defense counsel argued that the accused is a farmer with agricultural income of Rs. 6-7 lakhs annually and lacks financial means to repay Rs. 2,50,000. The court found the allegations against the accused credible, noting the check (Exhibit P-1) was presented to the bank on 03.01.2025 and the accused lacks the financial capacity to honor it. The court rejected the defense arguments and proceeded with the case based on the witness testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KRISHNARAJANAGARA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case