HEMALATHA C.M vs PRAKASH M.K — 85/2022
Case under U/s 5/200 R/w 138 Ni Act Section 200ofcrpc. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAMS400002612022
Next Hearing
15th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
85/2022
Filing Date
22-02-2022
Registration No
85/2022
Registration Date
22-02-2022
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KRISHNARAJANAGARA
Judge
922-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KRISHNARAJANAGAR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HEMALATHA C.M
Adv. A.P. PARAMESHWARAPPA
Respondent(s)
PRAKASH M.K
Hearing History
Judge: 922-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KRISHNARAJANAGAR
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
OBJECTION
OBJECTION
SUMMONS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 18-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 07-03-2026 | OBJECTION | |
| 28-02-2026 | OBJECTION | |
| 27-01-2026 | SUMMONS |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed the accused's application under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act seeking a handwriting expert examination to compare the signature on the disputed cheque with the accused's admitted signature. The court found that since the accused categorically denied the signature on the cheque and the complainant had no objection to expert comparison, the examination was necessary to adjudicate the dispute. Both parties are directed to furnish details of a forensic laboratory, with the case called for 12.03.2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed the accused's application under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act seeking a handwriting expert examination to compare the signature on the disputed cheque with the accused's admitted signature. The court found that since the accused categorically denied the signature on the cheque and the complainant had no objection to expert comparison, the examination was necessary to adjudicate the dispute. Both parties are directed to furnish details of a forensic laboratory, with the case called for 12.03.2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts