SANDEEPA S.M. vs MANJULA — 25/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section U.S223BNSS. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAMS400001102025
Next Hearing
22nd April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
25/2025
Filing Date
29-01-2025
Registration No
25/2025
Registration Date
29-01-2025
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KRISHNARAJANAGARA
Judge
922-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KRISHNARAJANAGAR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SANDEEPA S.M.
Adv. G.L. DHARMA
Respondent(s)
MANJULA
Hearing History
Judge: 922-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KRISHNARAJANAGAR
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 25-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 21-02-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 11-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary This civil case (CC No. 25/2025) involves disputed loan transactions. The court examined witness testimony regarding claims of three lakh rupees borrowed on 13-08-2024, with conflicting accounts about the actual amount and supporting documentation. The court found discrepancies in the defendant's address details and noted that a cheque issued for three lakh rupees bounced due to insufficient funds on 23-10-2024, with no corroborating bank documents provided. The case was adjourned to allow the defendant's counsel time for further cross-examination of the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This civil case (CC No. 25/2025) involves disputed loan transactions. The court examined witness testimony regarding claims of three lakh rupees borrowed on 13-08-2024, with conflicting accounts about the actual amount and supporting documentation. The court found discrepancies in the defendant's address details and noted that a cheque issued for three lakh rupees bounced due to insufficient funds on 23-10-2024, with no corroborating bank documents provided. The case was adjourned to allow the defendant's counsel time for further cross-examination of the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts