SACHIN KUMAR K.S. vs NAGESHA — 2/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section u/s223bnss. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 18th May 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAMS400000232025
Next Hearing
18th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2/2025
Filing Date
08-01-2025
Registration No
2/2025
Registration Date
08-01-2025
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KRISHNARAJANAGARA
Judge
922-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KRISHNARAJANAGAR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SACHIN KUMAR K.S.
Adv. RAVI SHANKAR. L.V.
Respondent(s)
NAGESHA
Hearing History
Judge: 922-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KRISHNARAJANAGAR
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
OBJECTION
OBJECTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | HEARING | |
| 07-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 21-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 02-02-2026 | OBJECTION | |
| 12-01-2026 | OBJECTION |
Interim Orders
Summary This civil case (C.C. No. 2/2025) involves a cheque bounce dispute heard on 03-07-2025. The court examined witness testimony regarding a debt of ₹3,60,000, three blank cheques provided as security, and allegations of forgery. The court found the defendant liable for issuing invalid cheques and confirmed the witness's signature on key documents while noting discrepancies in the defendant's claims regarding cheque delivery and payment obligations. The case proceeded with cross-examination, and the court directed the defendant to repay the outstanding loan amount along with the remaining dues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This civil case (C.C. No. 2/2025) involves a cheque bounce dispute heard on 03-07-2025. The court examined witness testimony regarding a debt of ₹3,60,000, three blank cheques provided as security, and allegations of forgery. The court found the defendant liable for issuing invalid cheques and confirmed the witness's signature on key documents while noting discrepancies in the defendant's claims regarding cheque delivery and payment obligations. The case proceeded with cross-examination, and the court directed the defendant to repay the outstanding loan amount along with the remaining dues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts