KRISHNAIAH vs N. RAVI — 76/2021
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section U/S 374. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 17th March 2026.
CRL.A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: KAMS320089892023
Filing Number
76/2021
Filing Date
26-Mar-2021
Registration No
76/2021
Registration Date
26-Mar-2021
Court
VIII ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT,MYSURU SITTING AT HUNSUR
Judge
1177-VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KRISHNAIAH
Adv. LAKSHMI KANTHA.K.J
Respondent(s)
-
1.N. RAVI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
JudgmentView PDF
Summary of Case 76/2021: Krishnaiah v. N. Ravi The appellate court dismissed Krishnaiah's appeal against his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court upheld the trial court's finding that Krishnaiah issued a dishonored cheque for Rs. 2,25,000 to repay a loan, failed to respond to legal notice, and did not rebut statutory presumptions favoring the complainant. The accused was ordered to pay a fine of Rs. 3,56,625 and undergo 4 months imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
02-Mar-2026
Judgement
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
29-Jan-2026
Arguments
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
26-Dec-2025
Arguments
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
24-Nov-2025
Arguments
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
17-Nov-2025
Arguments
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
13-Oct-2025
Arguments
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
15-Sep-2025
Arguments
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
12-Sep-2025
Arguments
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
09-Sep-2025
Arguments
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
29-Jul-2025
Arguments
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
09-Jun-2025
Arguments
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
24-Apr-2025
Arguments
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
24-Mar-2025
Arguments
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
11-Mar-2025
Arguments
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
27-Jan-2025
Arguments
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
08-Jan-2025
Arguments
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
24-Dec-2024
Arguments
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
26-Nov-2024
Arguments
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
21-Oct-2024
Arguments
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
04-Sep-2024
Arguments
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
26-Jul-2024
Arguments
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
19-Jun-2024
Arguments
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
01-Apr-2024
Arguments
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
15-Feb-2024
Arguments
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
16-Jan-2024
Arguments
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
21-Nov-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Mar-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 76/2021
Summary of Case 76/2021: Krishnaiah v. N. Ravi The appellate court dismissed Krishnaiah's appeal against his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court upheld the trial court's finding that Krishnaiah issued a dishonored cheque for Rs. 2,25,000 to repay a loan, failed to respond to legal notice, and did not rebut statutory presumptions favoring the complainant. The accused was ordered to pay a fine of Rs. 3,56,625 and undergo 4 months imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts