MAHADEVA vs THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER — 90/2023

Case under Land Acquisition (Mines) Act Section U/S 54. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 20-Jun-2026 this date has passed

LAC(APPL) - L.A.C.APPEAL

CNR: KAMS320072152023

Filing Number

93/2023

Filing Date

29-May-2023

Registration No

90/2023

Registration Date

07-Jun-2023

Court

VIII ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT,MYSURU SITTING AT HUNSUR

Judge

1177-VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

Last updated 09-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition (Mines) Act Section U/S 54

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAHADEVA

    Adv. MANJEGOWDA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

Case History

  1. 20-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  4. 07-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  5. 31-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  6. 22-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  7. 06-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  8. 19-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  9. 03-May-2025

    Arguments

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  10. 19-Apr-2025

    DepositionView PDF

    In LAC(A) 90/2023, the court examined witness PW-1 on 19-04-2025 regarding a land acquisition case involving property in Bettadapura village (Survey No. 22/6). The respondent (ADGP) contended that the appellant had already received compensation for 10 units of acquired land and had no valid grounds for seeking higher compensation, citing delay in filing the appeal and lack of proper justification. The court found the appellant's arguments regarding entitlement to enhanced compensation to be without merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  11. 19-Apr-2025

    Arguments

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  12. 01-Mar-2025

    Enquiry

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  13. 04-Jan-2025

    Objection

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  14. 26-Oct-2024

    Objection

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  15. 03-Aug-2024

    Objection

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  16. 15-Jun-2024

    Objection

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  17. 02-Mar-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  18. 29-May-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 90/2023

casestatus.in Summary

In LAC(A) 90/2023, the court examined witness PW-1 on 19-04-2025 regarding a land acquisition case involving property in Bettadapura village (Survey No. 22/6). The respondent (ADGP) contended that the appellant had already received compensation for 10 units of acquired land and had no valid grounds for seeking higher compensation, citing delay in filing the appeal and lack of proper justification. The court found the appellant's arguments regarding entitlement to enhanced compensation to be without merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case