MAHADEVA vs THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER — 90/2023

Case under Land Acquisition (mines) Act Section U/S 54. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.

LAC(APPL) - L.A.C.APPEAL

CNR: KAMS320072152023

ARGUMENTS

Next Hearing

20th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

93/2023

Filing Date

29-05-2023

Registration No

90/2023

Registration Date

07-06-2023

Court

VIII ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT,MYSURU SITTING AT HUNSUR

Judge

1177-VIII ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGEMYSURU SITTING AT HUNSUR

Acts & Sections

LAND ACQUISITION (MINES) ACT Section U/S 54

Petitioner(s)

MAHADEVA

Adv. MANJEGOWDA

Respondent(s)

THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

Hearing History

Judge: 1177-VIII ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGEMYSURU SITTING AT HUNSUR

04-04-2026

ARGUMENTS

07-03-2026

ARGUMENTS

07-02-2026

ARGUMENTS

31-01-2026

ARGUMENTS

22-11-2025

ARGUMENTS

Interim Orders

19-04-2025
Deposition

In LAC(A) 90/2023, the court examined witness PW-1 on 19-04-2025 regarding a land acquisition case involving property in Bettadapura village (Survey No. 22/6). The respondent (ADGP) contended that the appellant had already received compensation for 10 units of acquired land and had no valid grounds for seeking higher compensation, citing delay in filing the appeal and lack of proper justification. The court found the appellant's arguments regarding entitlement to enhanced compensation to be without merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

In LAC(A) 90/2023, the court examined witness PW-1 on 19-04-2025 regarding a land acquisition case involving property in Bettadapura village (Survey No. 22/6). The respondent (ADGP) contended that the appellant had already received compensation for 10 units of acquired land and had no valid grounds for seeking higher compensation, citing delay in filing the appeal and lack of proper justification. The court found the appellant's arguments regarding entitlement to enhanced compensation to be without merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

VIII ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT,MYSURU SITTING AT HUNSUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case