SANNAPPACHARI DEAD BY KRS SAROJAMMA vs THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER — 89/2023

Case under Land Acquisition (Mines) Act Section U/S 54. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 20-Jun-2026 this date has passed

LAC(APPL) - L.A.C.APPEAL

CNR: KAMS320072112023

Filing Number

92/2023

Filing Date

29-May-2023

Registration No

89/2023

Registration Date

07-Jun-2023

Court

VIII ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT,MYSURU SITTING AT HUNSUR

Judge

1177-VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

Last updated 09-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition (Mines) Act Section U/S 54

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANNAPPACHARI DEAD BY KRS SAROJAMMA

    Adv. MANJEGOWDA

  2. 2.GANESHACHARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

Case History

  1. 20-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  4. 07-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  5. 31-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  6. 22-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  7. 06-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  8. 19-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  9. 03-May-2025

    Arguments

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  10. 19-Apr-2025

    DepositionView PDF

    Summary In LAC(A) 89/2023, the court heard witness examination on 19-04-2025 and admitted documentary evidence including certified copies of prior judgments (LAC 89/2017 and LAC 7/2009), a death certificate, and a tree document. The court rejected the appellant's arguments seeking enhanced compensation for acquired land, finding no valid grounds for the 4225-day delay in filing the appeal and no justification for higher relief. The appeal was dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  11. 19-Apr-2025

    Arguments

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  12. 01-Mar-2025

    Enquiry

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  13. 04-Jan-2025

    Objection

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  14. 26-Oct-2024

    Objection

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  15. 03-Aug-2024

    Objection

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  16. 15-Jun-2024

    Objection

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  17. 02-Mar-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  18. 29-May-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 89/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In LAC(A) 89/2023, the court heard witness examination on 19-04-2025 and admitted documentary evidence including certified copies of prior judgments (LAC 89/2017 and LAC 7/2009), a death certificate, and a tree document. The court rejected the appellant's arguments seeking enhanced compensation for acquired land, finding no valid grounds for the 4225-day delay in filing the appeal and no justification for higher relief. The appeal was dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case