HANUMA BHOVI vs THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER — 486/2022
Case under Land Acquisition (mines) Act Section U/S 54. Status: RESPONDENT EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.
LAC(APPL) - L.A.C.APPEAL
CNR: KAMS320071492023
Next Hearing
18th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
499/2022
Filing Date
16-11-2022
Registration No
486/2022
Registration Date
16-11-2022
Court
VIII ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT,MYSURU SITTING AT HUNSUR
Judge
1177-VIII ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGEMYSURU SITTING AT HUNSUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HANUMA BHOVI
Adv. MANJEGOWDA
Respondent(s)
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
Hearing History
Judge: 1177-VIII ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGEMYSURU SITTING AT HUNSUR
RESPONDENT EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
OBJECTION
OBJECTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | RESPONDENT EVIDENCE | |
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 24-01-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 06-12-2025 | OBJECTION | |
| 18-10-2025 | OBJECTION |
Interim Orders
In LAC(A) 486/2022, the court heard witness PW-1 on 17-08-2024 regarding a land dispute case. The respondent's counsel argued that the petitioner had already received compensation in a previous execution case and was not entitled to additional relief, having failed to file an appeal within the prescribed period. The court found the petitioner's testimony regarding the compensation claim to be unsubstantiated and dismissed the petition, upholding the earlier judgment as legally valid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
In LAC(A) 486/2022, the court heard witness PW-1 on 17-08-2024 regarding a land dispute case. The respondent's counsel argued that the petitioner had already received compensation in a previous execution case and was not entitled to additional relief, having failed to file an appeal within the prescribed period. The court found the petitioner's testimony regarding the compensation claim to be unsubstantiated and dismissed the petition, upholding the earlier judgment as legally valid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts