HANUMA BHOVI vs THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER — 486/2022
Case under Land Acquisition (Mines) Act Section U/S 54. Status: Respondent Evidence. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.
LAC(APPL) - L.A.C.APPEAL
CNR: KAMS320071492023
Filing Number
499/2022
Filing Date
16-Nov-2022
Registration No
486/2022
Registration Date
16-Nov-2022
Court
VIII ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT,MYSURU SITTING AT HUNSUR
Judge
1177-VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
Last updated 09-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HANUMA BHOVI
Adv. MANJEGOWDA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
Case History
-
18-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
04-Apr-2026
Respondent Evidence
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
07-Mar-2026
Evidence
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
24-Jan-2026
Evidence
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
06-Dec-2025
Objection
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
18-Oct-2025
Objection
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
23-Aug-2025
Call For T.C.R
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
28-Jun-2025
Call For T.C.R
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
05-Apr-2025
Call For T.C.R
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
29-Mar-2025
Arguments
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
25-Jan-2025
Await Tcr
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
07-Dec-2024
Await Tcr
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
19-Oct-2024
Await Tcr
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
17-Aug-2024
DepositionView PDF
In LAC(A) 486/2022, the court heard witness PW-1 on 17-08-2024 regarding a land dispute case. The respondent's counsel argued that the petitioner had already received compensation in a previous execution case and was not entitled to additional relief, having failed to file an appeal within the prescribed period. The court found the petitioner's testimony regarding the compensation claim to be unsubstantiated and dismissed the petition, upholding the earlier judgment as legally valid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Aug-2024
Await Tcr
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
27-Jul-2024
Await Tcr
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
27-Apr-2024
Await Tcr
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
20-Jan-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Nov-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 486/2022
In LAC(A) 486/2022, the court heard witness PW-1 on 17-08-2024 regarding a land dispute case. The respondent's counsel argued that the petitioner had already received compensation in a previous execution case and was not entitled to additional relief, having failed to file an appeal within the prescribed period. The court found the petitioner's testimony regarding the compensation claim to be unsubstantiated and dismissed the petition, upholding the earlier judgment as legally valid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts