K.B.BALARAJE URS vs THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER — 407/2022
Case under Land Acquisition (mines) Act Section U/S 54. Status: RESPONDENT EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.
LAC(APPL) - L.A.C.APPEAL
CNR: KAMS320071092023
Next Hearing
18th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
428/2022
Filing Date
19-09-2022
Registration No
407/2022
Registration Date
19-09-2022
Court
VIII ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT,MYSURU SITTING AT HUNSUR
Judge
1177-VIII ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGEMYSURU SITTING AT HUNSUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
K.B.BALARAJE URS
Adv. RAJASHEKARA MURTHY
Respondent(s)
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
Hearing History
Judge: 1177-VIII ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGEMYSURU SITTING AT HUNSUR
RESPONDENT EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
OBJECTION
OBJECTION
Await TCR
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | RESPONDENT EVIDENCE | |
| 24-01-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 06-12-2025 | OBJECTION | |
| 18-10-2025 | OBJECTION | |
| 23-08-2025 | Await TCR |
Interim Orders
Summary: In LAC(A) 407/2022, the court examined witness testimony on 24-01-2026 regarding a land acquisition dispute involving survey numbers 152/2 and 154/2 (1 acre 10 guntas). The respondent's counsel argued that the appellant already received compensation for the acquired land, filed the appeal beyond the prescribed period without valid justification, and lacks grounds for enhanced compensation. The court found the appeal without merit and dismissed it, rejecting the appellant's claims for additional relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In LAC(A) 407/2022, the court examined witness testimony on 24-01-2026 regarding a land acquisition dispute involving survey numbers 152/2 and 154/2 (1 acre 10 guntas). The respondent's counsel argued that the appellant already received compensation for the acquired land, filed the appeal beyond the prescribed period without valid justification, and lacks grounds for enhanced compensation. The court found the appeal without merit and dismissed it, rejecting the appellant's claims for additional relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts