CHANDREGOWDA vs THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER — 179/2023

Case under Land Acquisition (mines) Act Section U/S 54. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.

LAC(APPL) - L.A.C.APPEAL

CNR: KAMS320070252023

ARGUMENTS

Next Hearing

20th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

185/2023

Filing Date

26-07-2023

Registration No

179/2023

Registration Date

28-07-2023

Court

VIII ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT,MYSURU SITTING AT HUNSUR

Judge

1177-VIII ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGEMYSURU SITTING AT HUNSUR

Acts & Sections

LAND ACQUISITION (MINES) ACT Section U/S 54

Petitioner(s)

CHANDREGOWDA

Adv. MANJEGOWDA

Respondent(s)

THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

Hearing History

Judge: 1177-VIII ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGEMYSURU SITTING AT HUNSUR

04-04-2026

ARGUMENTS

07-03-2026

ARGUMENTS

07-02-2026

ARGUMENTS

31-01-2026

ARGUMENTS

22-11-2025

ARGUMENTS

Interim Orders

17-08-2024
Deposition

Summary In LAC(A) 179/2023, the court examined a land dispute case on 17-08-2024. The petitioner's witness was examined and certified copies of previous judgments (LAC 17/2012 and LAC 16, 5, 9, 11, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 35, 36, 37, 118/2012) were produced. The court rejected the petitioner's claim for additional compensation, finding that the remedy already awarded in the original judgment was adequate and that the petitioner failed to file an appeal within the prescribed period. The case was accordingly disposed of without granting further relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In LAC(A) 179/2023, the court examined a land dispute case on 17-08-2024. The petitioner's witness was examined and certified copies of previous judgments (LAC 17/2012 and LAC 16, 5, 9, 11, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 35, 36, 37, 118/2012) were produced. The court rejected the petitioner's claim for additional compensation, finding that the remedy already awarded in the original judgment was adequate and that the petitioner failed to file an appeal within the prescribed period. The case was accordingly disposed of without granting further relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

VIII ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT,MYSURU SITTING AT HUNSUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case