THIMMA SHETTY, DECEASED BY LRS(Legal Heir) vs SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER — 50/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/S.41,R1,R/W.96. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.
LAC(APPL) - L.A.C.APPEAL
CNR: KAMS320066452023
Next Hearing
18th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
49/2019
Filing Date
28-10-2019
Registration No
50/2019
Registration Date
02-11-2019
Court
VIII ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT,MYSURU SITTING AT HUNSUR
Judge
1177-VIII ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGEMYSURU SITTING AT HUNSUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THIMMA SHETTY, DECEASED BY LRS(Legal Heir)
Adv. J.K.MANJUNATH1.
ANNAMMA 1.
M.T.VENKATARAMANNA 1.
M.T.VENKATESH 1.
PARVATHI 1.
M.T.NAGARAJU 1.
M.T.SWAMY 1.
M.T. RAJU
Respondent(s)
SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, MYSURU
Hearing History
Judge: 1177-VIII ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGEMYSURU SITTING AT HUNSUR
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 07-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 03-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 15-11-2025 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 06-09-2025 | ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
Summary In LAC(A) 50/2019, the court examined PW-1's testimony recorded on 01-03-2025 regarding a land compensation dispute in Manchabayannuhalli village. The court found that the petitioner's appeal for enhanced compensation was dismissed, holding that he had already received adequate compensation for the acquired land (2 acres 2 guntas from Survey No. 146) and had no valid grounds for additional relief, noting the appeal was filed beyond the stipulated time period and the witness testimony was deemed unreliable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In LAC(A) 50/2019, the court examined PW-1's testimony recorded on 01-03-2025 regarding a land compensation dispute in Manchabayannuhalli village. The court found that the petitioner's appeal for enhanced compensation was dismissed, holding that he had already received adequate compensation for the acquired land (2 acres 2 guntas from Survey No. 146) and had no valid grounds for additional relief, noting the appeal was filed beyond the stipulated time period and the witness testimony was deemed unreliable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts