S.D. VIJAYKUMAR vs THE SPL. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER — 56/2017
Case under Land Acquisition (Mines) Act Section 54. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.
LAC(APPL) - L.A.C.APPEAL
CNR: KAMS320064892023
Filing Number
55/2017
Filing Date
28-Nov-2017
Registration No
56/2017
Registration Date
29-Nov-2017
Court
VIII ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT,MYSURU SITTING AT HUNSUR
Judge
1177-VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
Last updated 09-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.S.D. VIJAYKUMAR
Adv. MANJEGOWDA.S.T
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE SPL. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
Case History
-
18-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
04-Apr-2026
Arguments
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
07-Mar-2026
Arguments
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
07-Feb-2026
Arguments
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
03-Jan-2026
Arguments
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
15-Nov-2025
Arguments
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
18-Oct-2025
Arguments
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
23-Aug-2025
Arguments
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
05-Jul-2025
Arguments
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
21-Jun-2025
Arguments
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
03-May-2025
Arguments
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
19-Apr-2025
DepositionView PDF
Case Summary Case: LAC(A) 56/2017 Outcome: The court rejected the petitioner's claim for enhanced compensation for land acquisition. The court found that the petitioner did not file the appeal within the statutory limitation period (2621 days delay), failed to pay the required court fee, and was not entitled to seek additional compensation. The witness examination was completed on 19-04-2025, and the petition was dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Apr-2025
Arguments
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
15-Mar-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
15-Mar-2025
Evidence
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
18-Jan-2025
Further Arguments
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
16-Nov-2024
Further Arguments
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
19-Oct-2024
Orders
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
21-Sep-2024
Orders
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
31-Aug-2024
Hearing
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
06-Jul-2024
Hearing
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
01-Jun-2024
Hearing
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
06-Apr-2024
Hearing
VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur
-
25-Nov-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Nov-2017
Case filed
Registration No. 56/2017
Case Summary Case: LAC(A) 56/2017 Outcome: The court rejected the petitioner's claim for enhanced compensation for land acquisition. The court found that the petitioner did not file the appeal within the statutory limitation period (2621 days delay), failed to pay the required court fee, and was not entitled to seek additional compensation. The witness examination was completed on 19-04-2025, and the petition was dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts