SANJEEVABOVI ALIAS SANJEEVANAYAKA, DEAD BY LRS 1. RAMESHA vs THE SPL. L.A.O., — 53/2017

Case under Land Acquisition (mines) Act Section 54. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.

LAC(APPL) - L.A.C.APPEAL

CNR: KAMS320064872023

ARGUMENTS

Next Hearing

18th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

52/2017

Filing Date

27-10-2017

Registration No

53/2017

Registration Date

28-10-2017

Court

VIII ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT,MYSURU SITTING AT HUNSUR

Judge

1177-VIII ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGEMYSURU SITTING AT HUNSUR

Acts & Sections

LAND ACQUISITION (MINES) ACT Section 54

Petitioner(s)

SANJEEVABOVI ALIAS SANJEEVANAYAKA, DEAD BY LRS 1. RAMESHA

Adv. MANJEGOWDA.S.T.

SANJEEVA BHOVI @ SANJEEVA NAYAKA DEAD BY LRS., 2. MANIYAMMA

SANJEEVA BHOVI @ SANJEEVA NAYAKA DEAD BY LRS., 3. MAHADEVA

SANJEEVA BHOVI @ SANJEEVA NAYAKA DEAD BY LRS., 4. GOWRAMMA

SANJEEVA BHOVI @ SANJEEVA NAYAKA DEAD BY LRS., 5. JAYAMMA

SANJEEVA BHOVI @ SANJEEVA NAYAKA DEAD BY LRS. 6.NAGAMMA

Respondent(s)

THE SPL. L.A.O.,

Hearing History

Judge: 1177-VIII ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGEMYSURU SITTING AT HUNSUR

04-04-2026

ARGUMENTS

07-03-2026

ARGUMENTS

07-02-2026

ARGUMENTS

03-01-2026

ARGUMENTS

15-11-2025

ARGUMENTS

Interim Orders

15-02-2025
Deposition

In case LAC(A) 53/2017, the court examined witness testimony on 15-02-2025 and admitted various documentary evidence including certified copies of prior judgments and death/survival certificates. The court rejected the respondent's allegations that the affidavit contained false statements and held that the appeal was filed with legitimate purpose to obtain enhanced compensation for the land property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

In case LAC(A) 53/2017, the court examined witness testimony on 15-02-2025 and admitted various documentary evidence including certified copies of prior judgments and death/survival certificates. The court rejected the respondent's allegations that the affidavit contained false statements and held that the appeal was filed with legitimate purpose to obtain enhanced compensation for the land property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

VIII ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT,MYSURU SITTING AT HUNSUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case