S.K.CHANDRAKUMAR vs THE SPL.LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER — 14/2017

Case under Land Acquisition (Mines) Act Section 54. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 12th June 2026.

Case disposed

LAC(APPL) - L.A.C.APPEAL

CNR: KAMS320064252023

Filing Number

17/2017

Filing Date

01-Jun-2017

Registration No

14/2017

Registration Date

01-Jun-2017

Court

VIII ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT,MYSURU SITTING AT HUNSUR

Judge

1177-VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

Decision Date

12-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition (Mines) Act Section 54

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.S.K.CHANDRAKUMAR

    Adv. MANJEGOWDA. S.T

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE SPL.LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Orders

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Orders

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  6. 19-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  7. 18-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  8. 27-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  9. 29-Oct-2025

    Orders

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  10. 27-Sep-2025

    Orders

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  11. 23-Aug-2025

    Orders

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  12. 05-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  13. 21-Jun-2025

    Arguments

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  14. 03-May-2025

    Arguments

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  15. 19-Apr-2025

    Deposition

    The court examined petitioner S.K. Chandrakumar's appeal regarding land acquisition compensation for 3 acres and 1 acre 15 guntas of land (Survey No. 121/2). The court found that the petitioner received compensation but filed the appeal 2416 days after the lower court's final order, well beyond the statutory limitation period, and rejected the claim for enhanced compensation due to late filing and lack of proper court fee payment. The court upheld that the petitioner has no entitlement to additional compensation and dismissed the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  16. 19-Apr-2025

    Arguments

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  17. 15-Mar-2025

    Deposition

  18. 15-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  19. 18-Jan-2025

    Further Arguments

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  20. 16-Nov-2024

    Further Arguments

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  21. 19-Oct-2024

    Orders

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  22. 21-Sep-2024

    Orders

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  23. 31-Aug-2024

    Hearing

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  24. 06-Jul-2024

    Hearing

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  25. 01-Jun-2024

    Hearing

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  26. 06-Apr-2024

    Hearing

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  27. 25-Nov-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 01-Jun-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. 14/2017

casestatus.in Summary

The court examined petitioner S.K. Chandrakumar's appeal regarding land acquisition compensation for 3 acres and 1 acre 15 guntas of land (Survey No. 121/2). The court found that the petitioner received compensation but filed the appeal 2416 days after the lower court's final order, well beyond the statutory limitation period, and rejected the claim for enhanced compensation due to late filing and lack of proper court fee payment. The court upheld that the petitioner has no entitlement to additional compensation and dismissed the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case