VINOD RAJ vs JAGADEESHA — 5177/2025

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRL.A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: KAMS320012952025

Filing Number

5177/2025

Filing Date

09-Dec-2025

Registration No

5177/2025

Registration Date

09-Dec-2025

Court

VIII ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT,MYSURU SITTING AT HUNSUR

Judge

1177-VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VINOD RAJ

    Adv. AAFIYA KAUSER

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JAGADEESHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case Summary: 5177/2025 - Vinod Raj v. Jagadeesha The Lok-Adalath at Hunsur accepted a compromise petition wherein appellant Vinod Raj paid Rs. 1,15,000 to respondent Jagadeesha in full settlement of a cheque-related dispute. The court set aside the conviction and sentence previously imposed against the appellant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and acquitted him accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Await Notice

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    Issue notice to Respondent

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  6. 09-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 09-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 5177/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 5177/2025 - Vinod Raj v. Jagadeesha The Lok-Adalath at Hunsur accepted a compromise petition wherein appellant Vinod Raj paid Rs. 1,15,000 to respondent Jagadeesha in full settlement of a cheque-related dispute. The court set aside the conviction and sentence previously imposed against the appellant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and acquitted him accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case