VINOD RAJ vs CHALUVARAJU — 5133/2025

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED OUTSIDE THE COURT on 27th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRL.A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: KAMS320011562025

Filing Number

5133/2025

Filing Date

11-Nov-2025

Registration No

5133/2025

Registration Date

12-Nov-2025

Court

VIII ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT,MYSURU SITTING AT HUNSUR

Judge

1177-VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

Decision Date

27-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED OUTSIDE THE COURT

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VINOD RAJ

    Adv. AAFIYA KAUSER

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CHALUVARAJU

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Mar-2026

    Orders

    The court accepted a joint compromise petition filed by appellant Vinod Raj and respondent Chaluvaraju under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. After verifying the compromise terms with both parties and confirming their lawful agreement, the court approved the settlement and directed the trial court records to be returned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  5. 19-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  6. 06-Jan-2026

    Call For T.C.R

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  7. 12-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 11-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 5133/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court accepted a joint compromise petition filed by appellant Vinod Raj and respondent Chaluvaraju under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. After verifying the compromise terms with both parties and confirming their lawful agreement, the court approved the settlement and directed the trial court records to be returned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case