A K CHALUVARAJU vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA — 5073/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 27th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAMS320002222026

Filing Number

5073/2026

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Registration No

5073/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Court

VIII ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT,MYSURU SITTING AT HUNSUR

Judge

1177-VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

Decision Date

27-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 352,118(2),117(2),351(2),351(3),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.A K CHALUVARAJU

    Adv. RAJASHEKARAMURTHY

  2. 2.KAMALAMMA M M

  3. 3.T I UMESHA

  4. 4.SUNANDA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The court granted anticipatory bail to all four petitioners in a land dispute case involving assault, abusive language, and death threats. The judge found that while the offences were non-bailable, they were not punishable exclusively with death or life imprisonment, there were no grievous injuries, and the accused had no criminal history. Bail was granted on Rs.50,000 personal bond with conditions including cooperation with investigation, no witness tampering, weekly police attendance for two months, and application for regular bail within one month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Orders

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 5073/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted anticipatory bail to all four petitioners in a land dispute case involving assault, abusive language, and death threats. The judge found that while the offences were non-bailable, they were not punishable exclusively with death or life imprisonment, there were no grievous injuries, and the accused had no criminal history. Bail was granted on Rs.50,000 personal bond with conditions including cooperation with investigation, no witness tampering, weekly police attendance for two months, and application for regular bail within one month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case