MAHADEVA vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA — 5066/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAMS320002032026

Filing Number

5066/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

5066/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

VIII ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT,MYSURU SITTING AT HUNSUR

Judge

1177-VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0054

Police Station

HUNSUR RURAL PS

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 352, 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 351(2), 3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAHADEVA

    Adv. KUMARANAYAKA

  2. 2.GEETHA

  3. 3.NITHIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The court granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners (Mahadeva, Geetha, and Nithin) accused of assault and criminal intimidation charges arising from a family property dispute. The judge found that while the offences are non-bailable, they don't carry exclusive death or life imprisonment sentences, no property recovery is needed, and no grievous injuries were sustained, warranting bail to protect personal liberty. The court imposed conditions including Rs. 50,000 personal bonds each, cooperation with investigation, witness non-tampering, weekly police attendance for two months, and filing regular bail applications within one month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Orders

    VIII Addl. District And Sessions Judgemysuru Sitting At Hunsur

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 5066/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners (Mahadeva, Geetha, and Nithin) accused of assault and criminal intimidation charges arising from a family property dispute. The judge found that while the offences are non-bailable, they don't carry exclusive death or life imprisonment sentences, no property recovery is needed, and no grievous injuries were sustained, warranting bail to protect personal liberty. The court imposed conditions including Rs. 50,000 personal bonds each, cooperation with investigation, witness non-tampering, weekly police attendance for two months, and filing regular bail applications within one month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case