PRAMILA vs SHIVANNEGOWDA — 353/2022
Case under Order 7 Rule 1 R/w Sec 26 of Cpc. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED SATISFIED IN PART on 17th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS310064662022
Filing Number
357/2022
Filing Date
21-Sep-2022
Registration No
353/2022
Registration Date
23-Sep-2022
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNSUR
Judge
1096-I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED SATISFIED IN PART
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PRAMILA
Adv. S.LAKKEGOWDA
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHIVANNEGOWDA
-
2.SHANTHARAJU
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: Pramila v. Shivannegowda & Shantharaju (O.S. No. 353/2022) The court rejected the plaintiff's claim for specific performance of a property sale agreement but granted her alternative relief. The plaintiff proved she paid Rs. 1,50,000 as advance against a Rs. 2,00,000 property sale agreement dated 11.02.2021, remained ready to perform, and issued legal notice; however, the defendants sold the property to another buyer whose suit succeeded on 23.01.2025, making specific performance impossible. Consequently, the defendants were ordered to refund Rs. 1,50,000 with 24% annual interest from the agreement date within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
25-Feb-2026
Judgements
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
20-Feb-2026
Arguments
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
12-Jan-2026
Arguments
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
07-Nov-2025
Arguments
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
13-Oct-2025
Arguments
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
18-Sep-2025
Judgements
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
15-Sep-2025
Arguments
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
18-Aug-2025
Arguments
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
25-Jul-2025
Arguments
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
07-Jul-2025
Arguments
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
27-Jun-2025
Issue Notice
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
02-Jun-2025
Arguments
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
08-Apr-2025
Arguments
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
28-Mar-2025
Arguments
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
13-Jan-2025
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
21-Oct-2024
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
24-Sep-2024
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
05-Aug-2024
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
08-Jul-2024
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
24-Jun-2024
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
01-Apr-2024
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
15-Mar-2024
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
06-Mar-2024
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
27-Feb-2024
Call On
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
12-Jan-2024
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
03-Jan-2024
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
06-Nov-2023
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
29-Sep-2023
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
04-Aug-2023
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
19-Jun-2023
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
18-Apr-2023
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
02-Mar-2023
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
21-Jan-2023
Summons
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
29-Nov-2022
Summons
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
11-Oct-2022
Summons
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
23-Sep-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Sep-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 353/2022
Case Summary: Pramila v. Shivannegowda & Shantharaju (O.S. No. 353/2022) The court rejected the plaintiff's claim for specific performance of a property sale agreement but granted her alternative relief. The plaintiff proved she paid Rs. 1,50,000 as advance against a Rs. 2,00,000 property sale agreement dated 11.02.2021, remained ready to perform, and issued legal notice; however, the defendants sold the property to another buyer whose suit succeeded on 23.01.2025, making specific performance impossible. Consequently, the defendants were ordered to refund Rs. 1,50,000 with 24% annual interest from the agreement date within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts