CHANDRASHEKARA H.M vs RAJASHEKARA — 266/2022

Case under Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section 7RULE1&2,CPC. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAMS310056422022

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

17th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

267/2022

Filing Date

07-07-2022

Registration No

266/2022

Registration Date

12-07-2022

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNSUR

Judge

447-PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNSUR

Acts & Sections

order 7 rule 1 of CPC Section 7RULE1&2,CPC

Petitioner(s)

CHANDRASHEKARA H.M

Adv. K.V.VIRUPAKSHA

Respondent(s)

RAJASHEKARA

Hearing History

Judge: 447-PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNSUR

01-04-2026

EVIDENCE

12-03-2026

EVIDENCE

07-03-2026

EVIDENCE

27-02-2026

EVIDENCE

07-02-2026

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

20-07-2023
Deposition
20-07-2023
Deposition
20-07-2023
Deposition
06-01-2024
Deposition
09-02-2024
Deposition
05-04-2024
Deposition
14-11-2025
Deposition

Summary: In O.S. 266/2022, the court recorded the sworn statement of the plaintiff's witness (P.W. 1) on 14.11.2025. The witness testified regarding a disputed transaction involving a blank check allegedly given by the defendant to the plaintiff's brother in 2015 for Rs. 70,000, which was allegedly not returned and misused. The court noted the defendant's denial of receiving any money and found the defendant's evidence to be false. The case was adjourned for further proceedings, and the court directed that summons be served on the defendant at the address provided. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In O.S. 266/2022, the court recorded the sworn statement of the plaintiff's witness (P.W. 1) on 14.11.2025. The witness testified regarding a disputed transaction involving a blank check allegedly given by the defendant to the plaintiff's brother in 2015 for Rs. 70,000, which was allegedly not returned and misused. The court noted the defendant's denial of receiving any money and found the defendant's evidence to be false. The case was adjourned for further proceedings, and the court directed that summons be served on the defendant at the address provided. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNSUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case