AMMANNAMMA ALIYAS AMMANNI vs THAHASILDAR — 846/2025

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section U/S 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAMS310037812025

Filing Number

844/2025

Filing Date

23-Dec-2025

Registration No

846/2025

Registration Date

23-Dec-2025

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNSUR

Judge

1096-I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section U/S 13(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AMMANNAMMA ALIYAS AMMANNI

    Adv. NAVEENA G

  2. 2.MOOR KANNAPPA

  3. 3.ESHWAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THAHASILDAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Orders

    The court granted the petition and directed the Tahsildar to register the death of Mailarappa S/o Late. Mallaiah (who died on 14.03.1979) and issue a death certificate to the petitioners. The court found the petitioners' claims credible since they were illiterate and unaware of registration procedures at the time, accepted unchallenged testimony and supporting documents, and noted the respondent failed to contest the petition despite proper notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Deposition

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Orders

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  6. 28-Feb-2026

    Appearance Of Party

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  7. 14-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 23-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 846/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted the petition and directed the Tahsildar to register the death of Mailarappa S/o Late. Mallaiah (who died on 14.03.1979) and issue a death certificate to the petitioners. The court found the petitioners' claims credible since they were illiterate and unaware of registration procedures at the time, accepted unchallenged testimony and supporting documents, and noted the respondent failed to contest the petition despite proper notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case