MAHESHA vs THAHASILDAR — 803/2025
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section U/S 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 04th April 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAMS310036392025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
802/2025
Filing Date
10-12-2025
Registration No
803/2025
Registration Date
11-12-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNSUR
Judge
447-PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNSUR
Decision Date
04th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MAHESHA
Adv. A.MAHADEVA
JAYAMMA
MAHADEVA
Respondent(s)
THAHASILDAR
Hearing History
Judge: 447-PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNSUR
Disposed
ORDERS
EVIDENCE
PAPER PUBLICATION
NOTICE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 01-04-2026 | ORDERS | |
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 19-01-2026 | PAPER PUBLICATION | |
| 11-12-2025 | NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Principal Civil Judge & JMFC, Hunsur, allowed the petition filed under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969. The court directed the Tahashildar to register the death of Late Devamma (wife of Late Dasaiah) as occurring on 24.04.2010 at Adiganahalli Village, Hunsur Taluk, Mysuru District. The court accepted the petitioners' unchallenged testimony supported by genealogical documents, Aadhar cards, and newspaper publications, finding no reason to reject their evidence and noting that declining the petition would cause hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Principal Civil Judge & JMFC, Hunsur, allowed the petition filed under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969. The court directed the Tahashildar to register the death of Late Devamma (wife of Late Dasaiah) as occurring on 24.04.2010 at Adiganahalli Village, Hunsur Taluk, Mysuru District. The court accepted the petitioners' unchallenged testimony supported by genealogical documents, Aadhar cards, and newspaper publications, finding no reason to reject their evidence and noting that declining the petition would cause hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts