M.K.GURUPRASAD vs HARISH T. — 1620/2021

Case under Under Sec. 200 of Cr.p.c R/w 138 , 142 of N.i Act. Section 138NIACT. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAMS310031162021

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

18th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1620/2021

Filing Date

29-11-2021

Registration No

1620/2021

Registration Date

29-11-2021

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNSUR

Judge

1096-I ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNSUR

Acts & Sections

UNDER SEC. 200 OF CR.P.C R/W 138 , 142 OF N.I ACT. Section 138NIACT

Petitioner(s)

M.K.GURUPRASAD

Adv. MURALIDHARA

Respondent(s)

HARISH T.

Hearing History

Judge: 1096-I ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNSUR

07-03-2026

EVIDENCE

07-03-2026

EVIDENCE

24-01-2026

EVIDENCE

22-12-2025

EVIDENCE

15-11-2025

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

28-10-2022
Deposition
15-07-2022
Plea
16-05-2024
Deposition
15-06-2024
Deposition
22-06-2024
Deposition
21-08-2024
Deposition

Summary: In Civil Case CC 1620/2021 before the Additional Civil Judge and JMFC Court, Hunsur, a witness (Jagadish, age 57, bank employee) was examined on 21.08.2024 regarding a cheque dispute. The plaintiff's counsel argued that the defendant did not issue any cheque but falsely claimed to have given authorization, while the defendant's counsel contended that the plaintiff had a 15-year bank account relationship and the defendant provided favorable testimony. The court recorded the witness examination and continued proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Civil Case CC 1620/2021 before the Additional Civil Judge and JMFC Court, Hunsur, a witness (Jagadish, age 57, bank employee) was examined on 21.08.2024 regarding a cheque dispute. The plaintiff's counsel argued that the defendant did not issue any cheque but falsely claimed to have given authorization, while the defendant's counsel contended that the plaintiff had a 15-year bank account relationship and the defendant provided favorable testimony. The court recorded the witness examination and continued proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNSUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case