BILIKERE POLICE STASTION vs ERANNA NAYAKA — 2400/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498A,323,504,R/W34IPC. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAMS310030762022

Filing Number

2400/2022

Filing Date

28-Mar-2022

Registration No

2400/2022

Registration Date

28-Mar-2022

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNSUR

Judge

1096-I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

03

Police Station

BILIKERE PS

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 498A,323,504,R/W34IPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BILIKERE POLICE STASTION

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ERANNA NAYAKA

  2. 2.CHAMAMMA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: CC.No.2400/2022 Court Decision: The court acquitted both accused persons (Eranna Nayaka and Chamamma) of charges under IPC Sections 498(A) (cruelty in marriage), 323 (assault), and 504 (abusive language). Key Reasoning: The prosecution's sole witness (PW-1/Saraswathi, the complainant) turned hostile and denied the allegations, instead stating she had compromised the matter with the accused. The court found the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, and applying the principle that benefit of doubt favors the accused, acquitted both defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Disposed

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Judgements

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  7. 04-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  8. 10-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  9. 15-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  10. 29-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  11. 19-May-2025

    ChargeView PDF

  12. 19-May-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  13. 12-May-2025

    Charge

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  14. 24-Apr-2025

    Charge

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  15. 26-Dec-2024

    Charge

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  16. 05-Sep-2024

    Charge

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  17. 20-Jun-2024

    Charge

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  18. 03-May-2024

    Charge

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  19. 06-Mar-2024

    Charge

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  20. 22-Dec-2023

    Charge

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  21. 20-Oct-2023

    Charge

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  22. 03-Aug-2023

    Hear Before Charge - Hbc

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  23. 11-May-2023

    Hear Before Charge - Hbc

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  24. 23-Feb-2023

    Hear Before Charge - Hbc

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  25. 30-Nov-2022

    Hear Before Charge - Hbc

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  26. 14-Oct-2022

    Hear Before Charge - Hbc

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  27. 03-Oct-2022

    NBW Issued

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  28. 28-Sep-2022

    NBW Issued

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  29. 30-Jul-2022

    Summons

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  30. 08-Jun-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 28-Mar-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2400/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC.No.2400/2022 Court Decision: The court acquitted both accused persons (Eranna Nayaka and Chamamma) of charges under IPC Sections 498(A) (cruelty in marriage), 323 (assault), and 504 (abusive language). Key Reasoning: The prosecution's sole witness (PW-1/Saraswathi, the complainant) turned hostile and denied the allegations, instead stating she had compromised the matter with the accused. The court found the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, and applying the principle that benefit of doubt favors the accused, acquitted both defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case