MARIGOWDA vs THE THASILDHAR — 684/2025
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section U/S 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 07th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAMS310029122025
Filing Number
682/2025
Filing Date
28-Oct-2025
Registration No
684/2025
Registration Date
29-Oct-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNSUR
Judge
447-Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
Decision Date
07-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 09-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MARIGOWDA
Adv. HARSHAKUMARA
-
2.VENKATESHA
-
3.GANESHA
-
4.PUTTARAJU
-
5.DINESHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE THASILDHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
The court allowed the petition filed under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, directing the Tahashildar to register the death of Javari (wife of Late Karigowda) as occurring on 16.05.1981. The court accepted the petitioners' unchallenged testimony supported by notarized genealogical documents and a non-availability certificate, finding no reason to disbelieve their evidence and noting that denying registration would cause hardship to the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Mar-2026
Disposed
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
28-Feb-2026
Orders
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
22-Jan-2026
Paper Publication
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
20-Jan-2026
Steps
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
28-Nov-2025
Paper Publication
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
29-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 684/2025
The court allowed the petition filed under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, directing the Tahashildar to register the death of Javari (wife of Late Karigowda) as occurring on 16.05.1981. The court accepted the petitioners' unchallenged testimony supported by notarized genealogical documents and a non-availability certificate, finding no reason to disbelieve their evidence and noting that denying registration would cause hardship to the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts