BASAVEGOWDA vs HANUMANTHA SHETTI — 261/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/S 7 R,1. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAMS310016112025

Filing Number

261/2025

Filing Date

18-Jun-2025

Registration No

261/2025

Registration Date

05-Jul-2025

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNSUR

Judge

1096-I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/S 7 R,1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BASAVEGOWDA

    Adv. CHANDAN KUMAR ASWAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HANUMANTHA SHETTI

  2. 2.LATHAMANI C.V.

  3. 3.DAYANANDA

  4. 4.PRASANNAKUMAR C.H.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The Lok Adalath accepted a compromise petition filed under Order XXIII Rule 3 of CPC by parties Basavegowda, Hanumantha Shetti, Lathamani C.V., and Dayananda. The court found the compromise was voluntary and did not violate any rights, and accordingly decreed the plaintiff's suit in accordance with the agreed compromise terms. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Refer to La/Mediation

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  7. 09-Jan-2026

    W/S

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  8. 10-Nov-2025

    W/S

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  9. 25-Sep-2025

    W/S

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  10. 21-Aug-2025

    Steps

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  11. 07-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 18-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 261/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Lok Adalath accepted a compromise petition filed under Order XXIII Rule 3 of CPC by parties Basavegowda, Hanumantha Shetti, Lathamani C.V., and Dayananda. The court found the compromise was voluntary and did not violate any rights, and accordingly decreed the plaintiff's suit in accordance with the agreed compromise terms. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case