CHIKKAMALEGOWDA vs HANUMANTHA SHETTI — 259/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O 7 R, 1. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAMS310016082025

Filing Number

258/2025

Filing Date

18-Jun-2025

Registration No

259/2025

Registration Date

05-Jul-2025

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNSUR

Judge

1096-I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O 7 R, 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHIKKAMALEGOWDA

    Adv. CHANDAN KUMAR ASWAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HANUMANTHA SHETTI

  2. 2.LATHAMANI C.V.

  3. 3.DAYANANDA

  4. 4.PRASANNAKUMAR C.H.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The Lok Adalath accepted a compromise application filed by both parties under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the CPC, finding the compromise was voluntary and not obtained through coercion or undue influence. The court decreed the plaintiff Chikkamalegowda's suit in terms of the agreed compromise petition, with a final decree to be drawn accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Refer to La/Mediation

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  7. 09-Jan-2026

    W/S

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  8. 10-Nov-2025

    W/S

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  9. 25-Sep-2025

    W/S

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  10. 21-Aug-2025

    Steps

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  11. 07-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 18-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 259/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Lok Adalath accepted a compromise application filed by both parties under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the CPC, finding the compromise was voluntary and not obtained through coercion or undue influence. The court decreed the plaintiff Chikkamalegowda's suit in terms of the agreed compromise petition, with a final decree to be drawn accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case