B.N. MANJUNATH vs THE CHIEF SECRETARY — 326/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDERVII,RULE1,R/W/S26. Status: ORDERS. Next hearing: 23rd April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS310014942024
Next Hearing
23rd April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
324/2024
Filing Date
22-07-2024
Registration No
326/2024
Registration Date
26-07-2024
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNSUR
Judge
447-PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNSUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
B.N. MANJUNATH
Adv. B.S.YOGANANDA KUMAR
MADAPPA
GANGADARA
MAHADEVU.G.S.
PREMKUMAR
SUSEELAMMA
Respondent(s)
THE CHIEF SECRETARY
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER,
Hearing History
Judge: 447-PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNSUR
ORDERS
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | ORDERS | |
| 27-01-2026 | HEARING | |
| 22-11-2025 | HEARING | |
| 29-10-2025 | HEARING | |
| 27-09-2025 | HEARING |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Principal Civil Judge and JMFC at Hunsur dismissed the temporary injunction application (IA No.II) filed by six plaintiffs seeking relief from eviction by government authorities regarding commercial shop properties. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case, as they did not provide proper documentation regarding tenancy, rent payment receipts for 2023, or business authorization, while the defendants had legitimately issued a notice due to outstanding rent arrears. The court concluded that neither balance of convenience nor irreparable hardship favored the plaintiffs' position. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Principal Civil Judge and JMFC at Hunsur dismissed the temporary injunction application (IA No.II) filed by six plaintiffs seeking relief from eviction by government authorities regarding commercial shop properties. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case, as they did not provide proper documentation regarding tenancy, rent payment receipts for 2023, or business authorization, while the defendants had legitimately issued a notice due to outstanding rent arrears. The court concluded that neither balance of convenience nor irreparable hardship favored the plaintiffs' position. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts