B.N. MANJUNATH vs THE CHIEF SECRETARY — 326/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDERVII,RULE1,R/W/S26. Status: Orders. Next hearing: 23rd April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS310014942024
Filing Number
324/2024
Filing Date
22-Jul-2024
Registration No
326/2024
Registration Date
26-Jul-2024
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNSUR
Judge
447-Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
Last updated 09-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.B.N. MANJUNATH
Adv. B.S.YOGANANDA KUMAR
-
2.MADAPPA
-
3.GANGADARA
-
4.MAHADEVU.G.S.
-
5.PREMKUMAR
-
6.SUSEELAMMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE CHIEF SECRETARY
-
2.DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
-
3.THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
-
4.EXECUTIVE OFFICER
-
5.PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER,
Case History
-
23-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Mar-2026
Orders
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
27-Jan-2026
Hearing
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
22-Nov-2025
Hearing
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
29-Oct-2025
Hearing
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
27-Sep-2025
Hearing
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
19-Aug-2025
Objection
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
21-Jul-2025
Objection
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
03-Jun-2025
Objection
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
20-Mar-2025
Objection
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
05-Mar-2025
Objection
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
06-Feb-2025
Objection
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
24-Jan-2025
For Compliance
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
07-Jan-2025
OrdersView PDF
Summary: The Principal Civil Judge and JMFC at Hunsur dismissed the temporary injunction application (IA No.II) filed by six plaintiffs seeking relief from eviction by government authorities regarding commercial shop properties. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case, as they did not provide proper documentation regarding tenancy, rent payment receipts for 2023, or business authorization, while the defendants had legitimately issued a notice due to outstanding rent arrears. The court concluded that neither balance of convenience nor irreparable hardship favored the plaintiffs' position. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Jan-2025
Call On
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
06-Jan-2025
Orders
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
19-Dec-2024
Hearing
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
16-Dec-2024
Hearing
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
04-Dec-2024
Orders
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
02-Dec-2024
Hearing
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
27-Nov-2024
Hearing
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
25-Nov-2024
Objection
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
22-Nov-2024
Objection
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
30-Oct-2024
W/S
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
13-Aug-2024
W/S
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
05-Aug-2024
W/S
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
26-Jul-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Jul-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 326/2024
Summary: The Principal Civil Judge and JMFC at Hunsur dismissed the temporary injunction application (IA No.II) filed by six plaintiffs seeking relief from eviction by government authorities regarding commercial shop properties. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case, as they did not provide proper documentation regarding tenancy, rent payment receipts for 2023, or business authorization, while the defendants had legitimately issued a notice due to outstanding rent arrears. The court concluded that neither balance of convenience nor irreparable hardship favored the plaintiffs' position. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts