LAKSHMAMMA vs J.VENKATESH — 234/2020

Case under Order 7 Rule 1 R/w Sec 26 of Cpc Section 7R,1R/W,26CPC. Status: NOTICE. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAMS310011532020

NOTICE

Next Hearing

18th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

234/2020

Filing Date

03-11-2020

Registration No

234/2020

Registration Date

05-11-2020

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNSUR

Judge

447-PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNSUR

Acts & Sections

order 7 rule 1 R/W Sec 26 of CPC Section 7R,1R/W,26CPC

Petitioner(s)

LAKSHMAMMA

Adv. M.E.MAHESH

RATHNAMMA

PREMA

Respondent(s)

J.VENKATESH

SURESH

SIDDALINGEGOWDA

PUTTAMMA

Hearing History

Judge: 447-PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNSUR

07-03-2026

NOTICE

06-02-2026

NOTICE

28-11-2025

NOTICE

09-10-2025

NOTICE

17-09-2025

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

17-03-2021
Deposition
01-04-2023
Issue
21-09-2022
Issue
20-04-2024
Deposition
25-07-2024
Deposition

Case Summary O.S. No. 234/2020 | Date: 25.07.2024 This is a civil suit concerning a disputed property. The court examined witness testimony regarding ownership claims and a property transfer allegedly made on 19.02.2000. The witness testified about the plaintiff's involvement with co-defendants and disputes over property partition. The court found the witness's testimony on key matters to be contradictory and unreliable, particularly regarding the plaintiff's rights to the property and their claim for partition. Outcome: The case proceeded with examination of witnesses; further proceedings continue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary O.S. No. 234/2020 | Date: 25.07.2024 This is a civil suit concerning a disputed property. The court examined witness testimony regarding ownership claims and a property transfer allegedly made on 19.02.2000. The witness testified about the plaintiff's involvement with co-defendants and disputes over property partition. The court found the witness's testimony on key matters to be contradictory and unreliable, particularly regarding the plaintiff's rights to the property and their claim for partition. Outcome: The case proceeded with examination of witnesses; further proceedings continue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNSUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case