BILIKERE POLICE STASTION vs NINGARAJU @ MANTA — 599/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 454,380IPC. Disposed: Uncontested--ACQUITTED on 08th April 2026.

Case disposed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAMS310009442021

Filing Number

599/2021

Filing Date

05-Apr-2021

Registration No

599/2021

Registration Date

05-Apr-2021

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNSUR

Judge

1096-I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

Decision Date

08-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

218

Police Station

BILIKERE PS

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 454,380IPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BILIKERE POLICE STASTION

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NINGARAJU @ MANTA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: CC.No.599/2021 Decision: Ningaraju @ Manta was acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 454 (house-breaking) and 380 (theft). The court found the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, primarily because the complainant (PW-1), who was the key witness, turned hostile and denied his own police statement, even testifying that he had compromised the matter with the accused. The court ruled that without credible evidence supporting the occurrence of the alleged burglary and theft of a gold bracelet and cash, the accused was entitled to acquittal under the principle that benefit of doubt must favor the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Judgements

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  7. 17-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  8. 10-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  9. 28-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  10. 13-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  11. 18-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  12. 19-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  13. 04-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  14. 02-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  15. 10-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  16. 27-Jun-2024

    NBW Issued

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  17. 07-Mar-2024

    NBW Issued

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  18. 18-Jan-2024

    ChargeView PDF

  19. 18-Jan-2024

    Summons

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  20. 30-Dec-2023

    Charge

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  21. 15-Nov-2023

    Charge

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  22. 13-Sep-2023

    Charge

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  23. 20-Jul-2023

    Charge

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  24. 09-Jun-2023

    Charge

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  25. 15-Mar-2023

    Charge

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  26. 08-Dec-2022

    Charge

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  27. 27-Oct-2022

    Charge

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  28. 15-Sep-2022

    Charge

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  29. 03-Aug-2022

    Hear Before Charge - Hbc

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  30. 14-Jul-2022

    NBW Issued

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  31. 06-Apr-2022

    Summons

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  32. 02-Feb-2022

    Summons

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  33. 11-Nov-2021

    Summons

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  34. 27-Aug-2021

    Summons

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  35. 27-May-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  36. 05-Apr-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 599/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC.No.599/2021 Decision: Ningaraju @ Manta was acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 454 (house-breaking) and 380 (theft). The court found the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, primarily because the complainant (PW-1), who was the key witness, turned hostile and denied his own police statement, even testifying that he had compromised the matter with the accused. The court ruled that without credible evidence supporting the occurrence of the alleged burglary and theft of a gold bracelet and cash, the accused was entitled to acquittal under the principle that benefit of doubt must favor the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case