Bhagyamma vs Kullanayaka — 206/2019
Case under Others Section Sec,125,Crpc. Status: SETTLED. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAMS310007842019
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
206/2019
Filing Date
27-03-2019
Registration No
206/2019
Registration Date
27-03-2019
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNSUR
Judge
1096-I ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNSUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bhagyamma
Adv. S.SHIVAKUMAR
Respondent(s)
Kullanayaka
Hearing History
Judge: 1096-I ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNSUR
SETTLED
HEARING
SETTLED
HEARING
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | SETTLED | |
| 07-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 07-03-2026 | SETTLED | |
| 21-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 14-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
This civil case (C.Misc 206/2019) involves testimony recorded on 21.02.2026 regarding a matrimonial dispute. The witness (petitioner) testified about her marriage of approximately 15 years, her residence with her husband's family, discrepancies in her age documentation (age 54 vs. 46 in petition), and her husband's poor health and financial condition. The witness also stated she provides financial support including medical expenses and receives a government pension of Rs. 2,700 monthly, which she alleges was obtained through false information. The case appears to involve property matters and maintenance claims, with cross-examination focusing on the wife's financial situation and the husband's inability to provide support. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This civil case (C.Misc 206/2019) involves testimony recorded on 21.02.2026 regarding a matrimonial dispute. The witness (petitioner) testified about her marriage of approximately 15 years, her residence with her husband's family, discrepancies in her age documentation (age 54 vs. 46 in petition), and her husband's poor health and financial condition. The witness also stated she provides financial support including medical expenses and receives a government pension of Rs. 2,700 monthly, which she alleges was obtained through false information. The case appears to involve property matters and maintenance claims, with cross-examination focusing on the wife's financial situation and the husband's inability to provide support. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts