KALANAYAKA vs THAHASILDAR — 136/2026
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section U/S 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 16th May 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAMS310005002026
Filing Number
136/2026
Filing Date
19-Feb-2026
Registration No
136/2026
Registration Date
19-Feb-2026
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNSUR
Judge
1096-I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
Decision Date
16-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KALANAYAKA
Adv. M.E.MAHESH
-
2.SANNATHAYAMMA
-
3.JAVARAMMA
-
4.MAHADEVANAYAKA
-
5.DODDATHAYAMMA
-
6.KARINAYAKA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THAHASILDAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-May-2026
OrdersView PDF
The court allowed the petitioners' petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, directing the Tahsildar to register and issue a death certificate for Sri. Doddakalanayaka (who died on 28.04.1990) upon collection of late fees. The petitioners, who were illiterate and unaware of registration requirements at the time of death, successfully proved their entitlement through affidavit evidence and supporting documents, with no opposition from the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-May-2026
Disposed
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
14-May-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
14-May-2026
Orders
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
02-May-2026
Call On
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
17-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 136/2026
The court allowed the petitioners' petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, directing the Tahsildar to register and issue a death certificate for Sri. Doddakalanayaka (who died on 28.04.1990) upon collection of late fees. The petitioners, who were illiterate and unaware of registration requirements at the time of death, successfully proved their entitlement through affidavit evidence and supporting documents, with no opposition from the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts