KARNATAKA GRAMIN BANK R/BY BRANCH MANAGER, ASPATHREKAVAL BRANCH vs PUTTARAJU — 71/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/SEC.26,R/W/O,VII,RULE,1. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAMS310003842025

Filing Number

70/2025

Filing Date

24-Feb-2025

Registration No

71/2025

Registration Date

28-Feb-2025

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNSUR

Judge

1096-I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/SEC.26,R/W/O,VII,RULE,1

Petitioner(s)

1.KARNATAKA GRAMIN BANK R/BY BRANCH MANAGER, ASPATHREKAVAL BRANCH

Adv. NARASIMHA GOWDA

Respondent(s)

1.PUTTARAJU
2.JAYAMMA
3.GOPAL

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
14-Mar-2026

Orders

The Lok-Adalath dismissed Karnataka Gramin Bank's suit against Puttaraju, Jayamma, and Gopal as not pressed after the bank's manager filed a memo stating the matter was settled. The court accepted the settlement and directed refund of court fees to the plaintiff bank. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
14-Mar-2026

Disposed

I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
29-Jan-2026

Refer to La/Mediation

I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
20-Nov-2025

Summons

I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
24-Oct-2025

Summons

I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
18-Sep-2025

Summons

I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
18-Jul-2025

Steps

I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
10-Jun-2025

Steps

I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
01-Apr-2025

Summons

I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
01-Mar-2025

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
24-Feb-2025

Case filed

Registration No. 71/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Lok-Adalath dismissed Karnataka Gramin Bank's suit against Puttaraju, Jayamma, and Gopal as not pressed after the bank's manager filed a memo stating the matter was settled. The court accepted the settlement and directed refund of court fees to the plaintiff bank. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.