SUBBEGOWDA vs THAHASILDAR — 172/2024
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 07th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAMS310003602024
Filing Number
171/2024
Filing Date
16-Feb-2024
Registration No
172/2024
Registration Date
19-Feb-2024
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNSUR
Judge
447-Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
Decision Date
07-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Last updated 09-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUBBEGOWDA
Adv. H.K.VENKATESH
Respondent(s)
-
1.THAHASILDAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Mar-2026
Orders
Summary The criminal petition (Crl.Misc 172/2024) was dismissed for non-prosecution by the JMFC, Hunsur. The petitioner and their counsel were repeatedly absent throughout multiple hearings despite being called multiple times and granted sufficient time, and failed to lead evidence, demonstrating disinterest in pursuing the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Mar-2026
Disposed
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
09-Jan-2026
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
22-Nov-2025
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
29-Sep-2025
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
21-Aug-2025
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
12-Jul-2025
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
21-Jun-2025
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
20-Mar-2025
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
04-Dec-2024
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
05-Oct-2024
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
06-Aug-2024
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
18-Jun-2024
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
18-Apr-2024
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
07-Mar-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Feb-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 172/2024
Summary The criminal petition (Crl.Misc 172/2024) was dismissed for non-prosecution by the JMFC, Hunsur. The petitioner and their counsel were repeatedly absent throughout multiple hearings despite being called multiple times and granted sufficient time, and failed to lead evidence, demonstrating disinterest in pursuing the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts