RAMESHA vs RUKMINI — 61/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O 7 RULE 1. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS310003022026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
60/2026
Filing Date
06-02-2026
Registration No
61/2026
Registration Date
10-02-2026
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNSUR
Judge
1096-I ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNSUR
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAMESHA
Adv. B.S.YOGANANDA KUMAR
KALAVATHI
PRATHEEPA
SUSHMITHA
YOGESHA
HANUMANTHA RAO
KENDAGANNA
Respondent(s)
RUKMINI
JYOTHI
Hearing History
Judge: 1096-I ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNSUR
Disposed
Refer to LA/Mediation
HEARING
W/S
SUMMONS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 11-03-2026 | Refer to LA/Mediation | |
| 07-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 23-02-2026 | W/S | |
| 12-02-2026 | SUMMONS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: In case OS 61/2026 heard before the Lok Adalath, the court accepted the application under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the CPC and decreed the plaintiff's suit in terms of the compromise petition agreed between the parties. A formal decree shall be drawn as per the compromise settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In case OS 61/2026 heard before the Lok Adalath, the court accepted the application under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the CPC and decreed the plaintiff's suit in terms of the compromise petition agreed between the parties. A formal decree shall be drawn as per the compromise settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts