ASHOKA V.S. vs MANGALAMMA — 9/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/S 223, 138 NI. Disposed: Uncontested--REGISTERED AS CC on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed

P.C.R. - PRIVATE COMPLAINTS

CNR: KAMS310002852026

Filing Number

9/2026

Filing Date

06-Feb-2026

Registration No

9/2026

Registration Date

06-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNSUR

Judge

1096-I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REGISTERED AS CC

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/S 223, 138 NI

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHOKA V.S.

    Adv. SANDEEP H.J.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANGALAMMA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  3. 14-May-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The court took cognizance of a cheque bounce complaint filed by Ashoka V.S. against Mangalamma under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding prima facie evidence of the offense. The court registered the case as a criminal case and directed summons to be issued against the accused, relying on High Court precedent that the Negotiable Instruments Act as a special enactment exempts cheque bounce cases from the notice requirement under Section 223 of BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 14-May-2026

    Disposed

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  5. 02-May-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  7. 17-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 06-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 9/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court took cognizance of a cheque bounce complaint filed by Ashoka V.S. against Mangalamma under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding prima facie evidence of the offense. The court registered the case as a criminal case and directed summons to be issued against the accused, relying on High Court precedent that the Negotiable Instruments Act as a special enactment exempts cheque bounce cases from the notice requirement under Section 223 of BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case